[Home] [Group] [Research] [Publications] [Tutorials etc] [Teaching] [Downloads] [Cluster-Info]

Orbital Rotation Models for NMR Parameters

The sign and magnitude of magnetic properties such as NMR parameters can sometimes be rationalized with the help of ‘orbital rotation’ models. The idea behind such models is the following: An occupied orbital may contribute to the ↓eld-induced magnetic moment in a molecule if the action of the quantum mechanical magnetic ↓eld (‘B-↓eld’) operator  ^
B on the orbital results in a function that can overlap well with another unoccupied orbital in the molecule.

This statement has its origin in terms that appear in the NMR shielding tensor expression, for example, when written in a molecular orbital theory framework [1]:


The integral measures the overlap between an unoccupied molecular orbital (MO) φunocc and the function ^Bφocc that is obtained from acting with the B-↓eld operator on an occupied MO. The quantum mechanical B-↓eld operator is proportional to the angular momentum operator ^
L and has three vector components, one for x, y, and z direction. In simple models, one considers a representation of the molecular orbital in a minimal basis of so-called atomic orbitals (AOs, which do not have to be the orbitals of actual atoms, but they have similar shapes).

Because of the relation to the angular momentum operator, the action of the B-↓eld on an AO typically resembles a rotation of the AO. The rotation angle is largest for p orbitals and decreases with increasing angular momentum of the AO. Below are Tables with worked-out results for s, p, d, and f orbitals, for magnetic ↓elds in x, y, and z direction. A factor of -i2c has been omitted from the magnetic ↓eld operator.

s and p orbitals:

d orbitals:

f orbitals:

Orbital rotation models for p orbitals have been in use in organic chemistry for quite some time to help rationalize trends in observed NMR chemical shifts [23]. We have developed orbital rotation models for metal complexes with occupied d and f orbitals [45]. For instance, by considering how the action of a magnetic ↓eld on the nonbonding 5d orbitals in Pt(II) and Pt(IV) complexes results in an e↑ective magnetic coupling with unoccupied metal-ligand σ* orbitals rationalizes the large chemical shift di↑erence between 195Pt chemical shifts for the two oxidation states [4].


[1]   Autschbach, J. The calculation of NMR parameters in transition metal complexes. In Principles and Applications of Density Functional Theory in Inorganic Chemistry I, Vol. 112; Kaltsoyannis, N.;  McGrady, J. E.,  Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, 2004.

[2]   Grutzner, J. B. Chemical shift theory. Orbital symmetry and charge e↑ects on chemical shifts. In Recent advances in organic NMR spectroscopy; Norell Press: Landisville, NJ, 1987.

[3]   Wiberg, K. B.;  Hammer, J. D.;  Zilm, K. W.;  Cheeseman, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6394-6400.

[4]   Autschbach, J.;  Zheng, S. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2008, 46, S48-S55.

[5]   Moncho, S.;  Autschbach, J. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2010, 48, S76-85.

 2011 { 2018 J. Autschbach. The material shown on this web page is in parts based on the results of research funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF, grants CHE 0447321 (2005 { 2011, 0952253 (2010 { 2014), 1265833 (2013 { 2016)) and educational projects supported by these grants. Any opinions, ↓ndings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily re'ect the views of the National Science Foundation.

[Home] [Group] [Research] [Publications] [Tutorials etc] [Teaching] [Downloads] [Cluster-Info]